"There are no moderates in Iran," morning show host Joe Scarborough said today. Less than 10 minutes later, he was smart enough to backtrack by noting, "The moderates are not in power."
His first comment rankled. Once a writing instructor, I regularly warned students against using "all," "none," "always," "never." Such words are hyperbole and immediately invite your readers to hunt for the one exception.
But such words are common in television talk shows and newspaper opinion essays. Massouda Jalal wrote an op-ed for The Wall Street Journal in December 2011, entitled "There are no moderate Taliban": "Seeking to negotiate with an implacable enemy could be seen either as foolish or
foresighted. The West obviously sees a deal with the Taliban as essential to its
transition, and therefore a pragmatic step. But this faith in negotiations
appears to be based on the belief that there exist 'moderate' elements of the
Taliban, and that they can be coaxed toward supporting constitutional democracy."
The sentiment was not new, and many lashed out after President Barack Obama suggested during a March 2009 interview with The New York Times that he would seek out and try to work with "moderate elements" of the Taliban to end the war in Afghanistan.
In March 2009, for Forbes, Tunku Varadarajan struggled for a definition, suggesting it must be "those who'd contemplate an abandonment of their jihad against Western forces in Afghanistan in exchange for some sort of power-sharing arrangement with the government of Hamid Karzai." He continued:
"It is their willingness to do deals, in other words, that makes them moderate, not the essential make-up of their beliefs and culture. That said, if they are willing to set aside their adamantine opposition to the infidel West and its puppet, Karzai, they are clearly less purist in their pursuit of an Islamist society than those who would fight to the finish. That makes them relatively moderate, if you like. Or just plain cynical."
Yes, women and children will suffer the most if Afghanistan can't achieve peace, if the government cannot deliver law and order.
Obama's willingness and the flurry of essays that followed by Varadarajan and others motivated me to find the exception to no moderates and write Fear of Beauty, about a village with people who want their children to attend school but who also appreciate their traditions, accept harsh penalties for violating those traditions, and do not want their lives to change.
So what to do about diplomacy? What to say to those who scoff at diplomacy?
Diplomacy is a delicate and, too often, time-consuming process. Those who would talk through a problem must study and divide opponents, finding others who may be swayed to end the fighting and pursue peace. Opponents who are ready to think a little differently are there. Women who want to attend school. Taliban supporters who want to engage in trade. Political leaders who want legitimate regional power. Afghanistan could be a case for aid with a schedule of strict, strict, strict conditions on corruption and human rights. And similar conditions should be imposed on other allies, including Pakistan, where a 14-year-old girl was shot by Taliban for advocating education for girls.
Fighting forces opponents to entrench and harden their positions. Trade, diplomacy, education are the enemies to extremism.
The war in Afghanistan has entered its 12th year. I'm not suggesting that the moderates and their supporters can succeed in Afghanistan or Iran - that the extremism can be contained. Moderates struggle in the United States, facing vehement attacks within their own political party and communities because they are even willing to consider working with the other side.
I can only hope that the aim of hyperbolic language about opponents isn't intended to make it easier to launch an attack. Because there are - and I'll avoid saying always! - moderates in our midst.
Photo of Afghanistan market, courtesy of Staff Sgt. Russell Lee Klika, US Army National Guard, and Wikimedia Commons
Tuesday, October 9
Sunday, October 7
It's the economy ...
The top concerns for most voters are jobs and the economy. Yet too many voters tend to box issues, as
though the economy is different from health care or Social Security, Afghanistan, the nation’s schools or the housing crisis. And too many politicians
ignore the economic implications of these issues.
Education: Children who receive a substandard education are more likely to cause social problems. Some may enter a life of crime. Others will become home health aides or serve us in fast-food restaurants and struggle to do their jobs. It’s wrong to put 30 or more children into a classroom with a math teacher who is paid a fraction of she or he could make in industry or a university – and expect high morale, good community relations or academic success. Children are the future workforce and future citizens, and their teachers need safe conditions, training, respect and appropriate wages.
Immigration: More people produce growth – they work, buy products and fill houses languishing on the market. Good policymaking, regulation and business could come up with an enforcement system that charges undocumented immigrants a fee.
Social Security and Medicare: The elderly depend on these programs, the centerpiece of any retirement planning in the middle class. Candidates who propose any privatization or reductions should be clear just how much people have to save to compensate for reductions. Age cut-offs won’t work among the elderly because they care fiercely about their children and economic health. Younger workers will resist paying for a program that provides for current seniors but is slated to end.
Climate Change: The science points to rising carbon dioxide emissions as contributing to volatile weather and rising seas. Ongoing denial will only add to future costs of food, shelter, insurance and business.
In the end, voters need to understand the economic implications of every issue. Optimism, confidence in addressing challenges and cooperation do more to boost revenues than criticism, fear and every man and women out for themselves.
Photo courtesy of the US Department of Defense and Wikimedia Commons. US Army Spc. Tiffany Larriba teaches counting and English with the Soldier in the Classroom program at Karabti San, Djibouti.
Health care: Voters cannot work if they are seriously ill.
Many who are healthy today realize that might not be the case tomorrow. Nearly
half of Americans – seniors, veterans, the poor and disabled – are covered by
public health. Most people can well
imagine the fear of losing their insurance, after a job loss or a medical
condition. Yes, the seriously ill can seek care at the local emergency room,
but that is not the most efficient form of treatment and hospitals are adept at
pursuing payment.
Reproductive health: Women and many men do not want to risk
new regulations on birth control. Sadly, an unexpected pregnancy during an economic
downturn is a nightmare and not blessing.
Wars: The Center for Budget and Policy Priorities has
estimated that about 15 percent of the deficit can be attributed to the wars in
Iraq and Afghanistan. Into its 12th year, Afghanistan is the longest
war on record. Investments in diplomacy and non-military foreign aid can reduce wars.
Taxes: The Bush tax cuts account for about 30 percent of the
deficit. The tax cuts were made without reducing programs. There’s a reason,
Americans want many of those programs, especially during a time of need. No leader can both keep the programs and
reduce taxes. Income for the wealthiest rose while the income of middle-class
went stagnant or decreased. Many voters support tax hikes to reduce the federal debt. The Bush tax cuts had a sunset clause
– and so could any tax hikes. Businesses and households with budgets typically
want to eliminate debt – and do so by rising prices before reducing service,
production or quality. Education: Children who receive a substandard education are more likely to cause social problems. Some may enter a life of crime. Others will become home health aides or serve us in fast-food restaurants and struggle to do their jobs. It’s wrong to put 30 or more children into a classroom with a math teacher who is paid a fraction of she or he could make in industry or a university – and expect high morale, good community relations or academic success. Children are the future workforce and future citizens, and their teachers need safe conditions, training, respect and appropriate wages.
Immigration: More people produce growth – they work, buy products and fill houses languishing on the market. Good policymaking, regulation and business could come up with an enforcement system that charges undocumented immigrants a fee.
Social Security and Medicare: The elderly depend on these programs, the centerpiece of any retirement planning in the middle class. Candidates who propose any privatization or reductions should be clear just how much people have to save to compensate for reductions. Age cut-offs won’t work among the elderly because they care fiercely about their children and economic health. Younger workers will resist paying for a program that provides for current seniors but is slated to end.
Climate Change: The science points to rising carbon dioxide emissions as contributing to volatile weather and rising seas. Ongoing denial will only add to future costs of food, shelter, insurance and business.
In the end, voters need to understand the economic implications of every issue. Optimism, confidence in addressing challenges and cooperation do more to boost revenues than criticism, fear and every man and women out for themselves.
Photo courtesy of the US Department of Defense and Wikimedia Commons. US Army Spc. Tiffany Larriba teaches counting and English with the Soldier in the Classroom program at Karabti San, Djibouti.
Labels:
social issues,
US economy
Wednesday, September 26
Clash
The posters in the New York Subway stations represent:
a. Clash of civilizations.
b. Clash in religions.
c. Clash of speech.
d. Or, all of the above.
Activist Mona Eltahawy was arrested for spray-painting over posters suggesting that Muslims are uncivilized. "Eltahawy was arrested after a supporter of Geller's initiative attempted to prevent her defacing the sign with a purple aerosol," reports Peter Beaumont for the Guardian.
Eltahawy defended her action as "free speech," too. But then she didn't pay $6000 in advertising costs for posters in 10 subway stations. In New York City, paid advertising carries more weight than activism.
The American Freedom Defense Initiative, which commissioned the posters, and Eltahawy are receiving far more publicity and attention than either paid for.
As a side note, The Color Purple is one of my favorite books about literacy.
Update, September 30: Eltahawy is on UP With Chris Hayes, and she describes the spray paint as pink - not black, so people could still read the poster. Chris asked her, why she responded to the trolls? She responded, that she felt compelled to respond to the bullies. Still like purple, not changing the art. Readers have asked who is the artist. Answer: 2-minute Paint creation.
a. Clash of civilizations.
b. Clash in religions.
c. Clash of speech.
d. Or, all of the above.
Activist Mona Eltahawy was arrested for spray-painting over posters suggesting that Muslims are uncivilized. "Eltahawy was arrested after a supporter of Geller's initiative attempted to prevent her defacing the sign with a purple aerosol," reports Peter Beaumont for the Guardian.
Eltahawy defended her action as "free speech," too. But then she didn't pay $6000 in advertising costs for posters in 10 subway stations. In New York City, paid advertising carries more weight than activism.
The American Freedom Defense Initiative, which commissioned the posters, and Eltahawy are receiving far more publicity and attention than either paid for.
As a side note, The Color Purple is one of my favorite books about literacy.
Update, September 30: Eltahawy is on UP With Chris Hayes, and she describes the spray paint as pink - not black, so people could still read the poster. Chris asked her, why she responded to the trolls? She responded, that she felt compelled to respond to the bullies. Still like purple, not changing the art. Readers have asked who is the artist. Answer: 2-minute Paint creation.
Labels:
advertising,
freedom of expression,
religion
Fighting for faith
My mother, Jeanne Marie Froetschel, was my role model for approaching other religions and respecting others' beliefs.
I remembered her wisdom this morning and wrote about her for On Faith blog of The Washington Post, after reading about about ads suggesting that the beliefs of 1 billion Muslims might not be civilized:
"Early in first grade, one of the nuns advised our class not to associate with children who attended other schools and believed other religions. My teacher, a younger nun, looked uncomfortable and quickly changed the topic.
"Later that day, I asked my mother about playing with friends who worshipped at other churches.
"'Playing with other friends won’t change your beliefs,' my mother said. She was beautiful, devout and confident that her children knew right from wrong at an early age."
I remembered her wisdom this morning and wrote about her for On Faith blog of The Washington Post, after reading about about ads suggesting that the beliefs of 1 billion Muslims might not be civilized:
"Early in first grade, one of the nuns advised our class not to associate with children who attended other schools and believed other religions. My teacher, a younger nun, looked uncomfortable and quickly changed the topic.
"Later that day, I asked my mother about playing with friends who worshipped at other churches.
"'Playing with other friends won’t change your beliefs,' my mother said. She was beautiful, devout and confident that her children knew right from wrong at an early age."
The ads are immature. The competition is unseemly. Great religions, great thoughts, do not have to advertise or insult the beliefs of others. Religious leaders shouldn't limit what adherents read or whom they associate with. Committing violence against nonbelievers does not convince others that a set of religious beliefs is worthy.
The guest blog concludes, "Ruthless, mean competition for adherents and power, insults and violence, give reason to Americans to distance themselves from religion and explore spirituality alone or among a diverse and comfortable group of friends."
Photo of Jeanne Marie Froetschel
Labels:
advertising,
competition,
religion
Exclusion
Exclusion goes hand in hand with religions and fraternities.
Excellent analysis from Sophie Gould of Yale Daily News: "Though Yale’s newest fraternity Beta Upsilon Chi (BYX) has announced a policy of admitting only Christians, it will have to change its membership rules if it intends to comply with Yale’s anti-discrimination policies."
But rush week isn't first-come, first-serve. It's about discrimination.
Photo of Harkness Tower on High Street, nestled between Saybrook and Branford residential colleges, courtesy of Wikimedia Commons.
Excellent analysis from Sophie Gould of Yale Daily News: "Though Yale’s newest fraternity Beta Upsilon Chi (BYX) has announced a policy of admitting only Christians, it will have to change its membership rules if it intends to comply with Yale’s anti-discrimination policies."
But rush week isn't first-come, first-serve. It's about discrimination.
Photo of Harkness Tower on High Street, nestled between Saybrook and Branford residential colleges, courtesy of Wikimedia Commons.
Labels:
fraternities,
religion,
Yale
Monday, September 24
Stories
Publicity doesn’t have to be a chore. Instead, authors need
to turn to what they do best – tell a story, shedding light on the motivations
and purpose behind their work. Every stage of publishing the book – from telling the story
to attracting an agent and publisher, hiring a publicist, posing for photos, answering questions from journalists
or fans, running workshops, sending out messages on social media – should include
storytelling
devices.
Photo of Afghan students participate in online discussion about traditional stories, courtesy of US State Department and Wikimedia Commons.
Stories of characters in a book probably connect with
stories from the author’s life – and authors can’t help but remember moments that
triggered the tale. So, more work has
probably been accomplished than the author realizes.
Every communication from an author can unleash back story:
- Books typically have several themes, and authors should have strong opinions on those themes. If those themes connect with current events, then draft 500 words – opinion essays, book reviews, feature articles and blog entries for newspapers or television – presenting a perspective drawing on anecdotes from real life or the novel itself. Such expertise leads to speaking engagements and opportunity to tell more stories.
- For profiles or interviews, be prepared to answer the question, “How did you get the idea of this book?” Nicholas Sparks tells that story on his website. And there’s the story behind ideas and their process: Greg Breeding describes the story behind Bono’s song, “One,” in an article for Story Matters, an online magazine from design and publishing firm Journey. “Great ideas do seem to come out of nowhere, but then again, the intentional push against mediocrity is the rich soil where excellence takes root,” he writes. “Hard work doesn’t necessarily produce greatness, but it’s hard to imagine that the really great ideas come without it.”
- Linking articles connected to book themes on an author’s website can attract invitations to write or speak.
- Images can relay stories and increase curiosity. Categories, captions and photos in Pinterest can reveal how an author selects details. Even a quick brief clip of a workshop, posted on YouTube, can introduce an author’s attitude.
- Communications – enchanting, intriguing, instructive or funny – should be concise, focused on one of the book’s theme. Twitter posts, long conversations or stand-alones, can relay a story and raise suspense. Tweets that read like poetry or moments of weakness, blasting a critic’s review, do attract notice.
- Take advantage of read-made social media for storytelling and control the story on LibraryThing, Goodreads or Facebook Timeline.
- No author is going to be an expert at every facet of publicity. Don’t panic. Jacket Copy from The Los Angeles Times gives the best advice – make it fun.
One huge difference between drafting story for novels versus
publicity is timing. Deadlines loom for publicity. Copy must be submitted
quickly. There’s less time or tolerance for a
bad first draft. Writers must be spontaneous, coherent and insightful for
social media and any type of interview.
Practice helps.
Photo of Afghan students participate in online discussion about traditional stories, courtesy of US State Department and Wikimedia Commons.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)